Telling Technology · Learning in public
Client & enterprise work

Ten AI systems.
One product company.

Built inside a complex hardware-product organisation: knowledge wikis, dashboards, governance, chatbots. Six shipped, four on the roadmap. Each case shows the problem, the system, and the value.

All screenshots are anonymized demos — a fictional brand, synthetic data. The systems are real. The channel’s own systems live on the Builds page.

Problem
What we built
Value
Customer testimonials

References willing to speak for us

Quotes are published only with each person’s written approval — name and role, never company names. More are being collected.

“Jacob turned our TechDoc output into a searchable, bilingual wiki. The AI caught template leaks, cut re-publish review time, and surfaced gaps nobody had flagged. Everything we’ve built with AI since rests on that foundation.

“Jacob set up single sign-on for three of our internal tools through a proper Microsoft Entra app registration, so only Qvantum accounts get in. He also built the publishing pipeline — push to GitHub, Azure deploys it automatically, no build servers to babysit. And he got every permission and secret wired correctly so it worked end to end.”

Customer

Nordpump · Nordic heat-pump manufacturer

Anonymized stand-in brand for a real industrial product company. Six systems shipped, four scoped on the roadmap below. All names and data on the screens are synthetic.

Knowledge-wiki handover page showing the three-layer raw/wiki/schema architecture anonymized demo
Case 01 Documentation

Product Knowledge Wiki

Product knowledge was locked in siloed PDFs nobody could search.

Problem

Technical installation manuals and product specs lived as scattered PDFs — hard to search, impossible to cross-reference, not translated.

Value

Institutional product knowledge made searchable, reusable and translation-ready — the backbone every downstream AI project built on.

What we built

Turned all documentation into a structured wiki with cross-linked entity and concept pages, embedded technical diagrams, and a bilingual EN/SE terminology set.

structured wiki cross-linked entities EN/SE terminology
Internal AI adoption hub with tutorials, use cases, ambassador programme and manager brief anonymized demo
Case 02 AI programme

AI Adoption Hub

AI projects were scattered across teams — no governance, no continuity.

Problem

No GDPR clearance process, no shared playbook, and no plan for what happens when the AI lead departs.

Value

A repeatable AI adoption playbook and a clean, documented handover — the initiative survives personnel changes.

What we built

Ran the AI programme as a tracked project: ambassador programme, GDPR/DPIA clearance guides, an AI setup tutorial on the intranet, and a final deliveries register designed for successor handover.

ambassador programme GDPR/DPIA guides handover register
NPI/CPI project status dashboard rendered as status cards with labels, risk and progress anonymized demo
Case 03 PMO

Project Status Dashboard

Project status lived in a fragile Excel only engineers could run.

Problem

The portfolio status file was maintained by engineers; PMs couldn’t operate it themselves and the data went stale between updates.

Value

Lower-maintenance, error-resistant status reporting that PM owners operate independently — no engineer in the loop.

What we built

Replaced the Excel layer with a static-HTML dashboard generated from flat text files and live issue-tracker cards, designed for non-engineer PM owners. Pure-stdlib render pipeline, full test suite.

static HTML flat text files issue-tracker cards 40 passing tests
AI governance vault: NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS and EU AI Act cards above a clearance checklist anonymized demo
Case 04 Governance

AI Governance Vault

No framework for adopting AI safely with sensitive data.

Problem

Compliance risk was undefined for AI use near sensitive or patent-adjacent data — so every use case stalled at “can we even do this?”.

Value

A governance and compliance foundation that enables safe enterprise AI adoption without regulatory exposure.

What we built

A compliance wiki aligned to NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS and the EU AI Act — with per-use-case clearance checklists.

NIST AI RMF OWASP LLM Top 10 MITRE ATLAS EU AI Act
Ask-the-wiki chatbot demo answering plain-language product questions with cited sources anonymized demo
Case 05 Support

Support Chatbot

Support spent hours answering questions the docs already answered.

Problem

The answers existed in the knowledge base — they just weren’t quickly findable when a customer was waiting on the line.

Value

Proved the knowledge base could power frontline Q&A — a working assistant for support staff from day one, with cited sources.

What we built

A Python chatbot answering from the product knowledge base via the Anthropic SDK, with prompt caching holding the full ~180 KB corpus in context.

Python Anthropic SDK prompt caching
Keyboard-first multi-step form: one question per screen, Enter to continue, progress 1 of 25 anonymized demo
Case 06 UX build

Keyboard-First Onboarding Form

Long, linear onboarding flows lost people before the end.

Problem

Friction-heavy intake: long forms, no flow, drop-off before completion.

Value

A reusable UI prototype demonstrating rapid build capability — and a template for future onboarding flows.

What we built

A keyboard-first multi-step web form — one question per screen, Enter to continue — Playwright-verified and shipped in a single sprint.

keyboard-first multi-step Playwright-verified one sprint

Roadmap

scoped · not yet built

Systems designed and scoped for this customer — concept visuals, not shipped software.

Concept: order intake screen where the matching framework agreement's terms are surfaced next to an incoming order concept visual
Roadmap 01 Sales ops

Contract Intelligence

Every order means digging through customer agreements by hand.

Problem

Sales ops manually check agreements for each incoming order — shipping rules, discounts, special terms buried in dozens of contracts.

Value

Eliminates slow, error-prone manual lookup — order processing becomes self-correcting, the right terms surface themselves.

Planned build

Index all customer contracts into a searchable knowledge base; incoming orders auto-query the matching agreement and surface the terms that apply.

contract index auto-lookup order intake
Concept: multi-agent run console with orchestrator, researcher, adversarial reviewer and synthesiser concept visual
Roadmap 02 R&D enablement

Multi-Agent Patterns Lab

Teams build agent workflows ad-hoc, duplicating effort.

Problem

No internal understanding of how to structure AI agent workflows — every team starts from zero and repeats the same mistakes.

Value

Internal capability-building: best-practice patterns teams adopt immediately instead of reinventing them.

Planned build

Stress-test multi-agent LLM workflows: an internal reference guide, an adversarial research-team pattern, and a demo app built end-to-end by parallel agents.

reference guide adversarial review parallel agents
Concept: edge controller dashboard with spot price curve, planned compressor windows and savings KPIs concept visual
Roadmap 03 Innovation

Edge Energy Optimiser

Hardware runs on fixed schedules, blind to electricity prices.

Problem

Units ignore live spot prices and weather forecasts — unnecessary energy cost for every installed customer, every day.

Value

An energy-cost differentiator — an innovation concept with engineering questions ready for R&D.

Planned build

An edge controller that dynamically optimises hardware operation against spot prices and weather: 3-phase roadmap, fieldbus data capture, European rollout plan.

edge controller spot prices 3-phase roadmap
Concept: SaaS revenue benchmark wiki comparing pricing models for connected products concept visual
Roadmap 04 Strategy

Revenue Benchmark Vault

Every pricing discussion starts from a blank whiteboard.

Problem

No structured benchmarks for SaaS billing and revenue models — strategy conversations restart the research each time.

Value

Rapid, reusable research assets that cut preparation time for strategic and pricing discussions.

Planned build

Structured benchmark wikis on SaaS revenue and billing models for competitive research and pricing decisions.

benchmark wikis pricing models competitive research

Want one of these inside your company?

I scope one constraint at a time, build the AI system to remove it, and measure the before/after.

Work with me →